Over at Patheos, Timothy Dalrymple has posted his interview with David French on the meaning and impact of the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez.  In this in-depth interview, David discusses free association precedent that the Supreme Court ignored in yesterday’s opinion.  He also highlights just how narrow the ruling actually is, thus correcting many media reports.  And since UC-Hastings’ policy is almost unique in the nation, he explains what impact the decision could have on Christian students at other schools, in both the short and long term.

Need a quick video demonstration of what is at stake in CLS v Martinez? Would you like a touch of humor thrown in? Missing your Recommended Daily Allowance of Justice Scalia? Our friends at Citizen Link (Focus on the Family Action) have you covered.

Please leave a comment below to share your thoughts or follow us on Facebook to join the conversation. http://www.facebook.com/SpeakUpU