<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stigma and Dogma, Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/freedom-of-speech/stigma-and-dogma-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/freedom-of-speech/stigma-and-dogma-revisited/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCDalum</title>
		<link>http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/freedom-of-speech/stigma-and-dogma-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>UCDalum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/?p=1240#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Thank you SO MUCH for putting this together in such a brilliant and concise way!  I am one of those dissenters in an &quot;increasingly cramped space&quot; at University of California, Davis.  I used to get shocked at how baseless many &quot;truths&quot; have been developed at the university, and could not understand when and how everyone decided to come to a consensus, and what they based their allegations on.  But being in my last year as an undergraduate, I am able to identify how a majority of the students simply regurgitate what their professors in lower division classes have instilled in them.  No wonder they get angry when I ask them questions which challenge the &quot;legitimacy&quot; of their statements - I don&#039;t think most of them have really thought about these &quot;instilled opinions&quot; much on their own - they&#039;ve just accepted what their professor led them to accept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SO MUCH for putting this together in such a brilliant and concise way!  I am one of those dissenters in an &#8220;increasingly cramped space&#8221; at University of California, Davis.  I used to get shocked at how baseless many &#8220;truths&#8221; have been developed at the university, and could not understand when and how everyone decided to come to a consensus, and what they based their allegations on.  But being in my last year as an undergraduate, I am able to identify how a majority of the students simply regurgitate what their professors in lower division classes have instilled in them.  No wonder they get angry when I ask them questions which challenge the &#8220;legitimacy&#8221; of their statements &#8211; I don&#39;t think most of them have really thought about these &#8220;instilled opinions&#8221; much on their own &#8211; they&#39;ve just accepted what their professor led them to accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCDalum</title>
		<link>http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/freedom-of-speech/stigma-and-dogma-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>UCDalum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/?p=1240#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Thank you SO MUCH for putting this together in such a brilliant and concise way!  I am one of those dissenters in an &quot;increasingly cramped space&quot; at University of California, Davis.  I used to get shocked at how baseless many &quot;truths&quot; have been developed at the university, and could not understand when and how everyone decided to come to a consensus, and what they based their allegations on.  But being in my last year as an undergraduate, I am able to identify how a majority of the students simply regurgitate what their professors in lower division classes have instilled in them.  No wonder they get angry when I ask them questions which challenge the &quot;legitimacy&quot; of their statements - I don&#039;t think most of them have really thought about these &quot;instilled opinions&quot; much on their own - they&#039;ve just accepted what their professor led them to accept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SO MUCH for putting this together in such a brilliant and concise way!  I am one of those dissenters in an &#8220;increasingly cramped space&#8221; at University of California, Davis.  I used to get shocked at how baseless many &#8220;truths&#8221; have been developed at the university, and could not understand when and how everyone decided to come to a consensus, and what they based their allegations on.  But being in my last year as an undergraduate, I am able to identify how a majority of the students simply regurgitate what their professors in lower division classes have instilled in them.  No wonder they get angry when I ask them questions which challenge the &#8220;legitimacy&#8221; of their statements &#8211; I don&#39;t think most of them have really thought about these &#8220;instilled opinions&#8221; much on their own &#8211; they&#39;ve just accepted what their professor led them to accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F for Fascist &#124;</title>
		<link>http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/freedom-of-speech/stigma-and-dogma-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>F for Fascist &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 03:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/?p=1240#comment-218</guid>
		<description>[...] here, when considering a society such as ours that too often prefers dismissive aphorism and stigmatization to reasoned discourse.  Ad hominem is easy; short-form quips are how we do social theorizing.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here, when considering a society such as ours that too often prefers dismissive aphorism and stigmatization to reasoned discourse.  Ad hominem is easy; short-form quips are how we do social theorizing.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

