Blog Home » Articles posted by Greg Scott - ADF National Media Relations Director

Things that make you go hmmmmmmm…

NWI reports: Marriage amendment debate pits social conservatives against businesses

The tension between the social conservatives and the business interests that comprise the modern Republican Party was on display Wednesday as an Indiana Senate committee debated whether to add the state’s existing ban on gay marriage to the Indiana Constitution.

…Jill Cook, vice president of human resources for Cummins Inc., said her company, which employs 5,500 workers at its Columbus, Ind., headquarters, would think twice about expanding if the amendment is approved.

“This resolution sends a powerful message that Indiana is not a place that welcomes people of all backgrounds, and it jeopardizes our ability to attract employees,” Cook said.

We’ve heard the argument time and again that states would lose business opportunities if they don’t start recognizing counterfeit marriages immediately. Usually, though, it is some representative from an activist organization like The Williams Institute making this claim. This time though, we’ve got an HR rep from a major corporation testifying publicly that a state marriage protection amendment (no, this is not a “ban on [same-sex] marriage”) would cause the corporation to look elsewhere to expand.

One pretty obvious problem with that.

A 2010 news release at Cummins.com: Cummins chooses Nashville for consolidated customer care center

Cummins Inc. (NYSE: CMI) has signed a lease with SmartSpace, LLC to open a consolidated customer care center in Nashville by the end of 2010. The center, which is projected to bring more than 200 new jobs to the metropolitan area, will be located at Two Rivers Corporate Centre, on McGavock Pike, just north of the Opryland Hotel.

Cummins employees from existing centers in Memphis and Cookeville, Tenn. and from Columbus, Ind. will be relocating to Nashville to kick off the operation, with additional team members being hired from Nashville as the new center grows.

That was in addition to the 2,000 employees Cummins already had in Tennessee.

So what’s the problem?

The state of Tennessee passed a marriage protection amendment in 2006 in a “real squeaker” — 81% of Volunteer State voters affirmed marriage by providing this most vital human institution constitutional-grade protection.

Tennessees’s marriage protection amendment reads:

The historical institution and legal contract solemnizing the relationship of one man and one woman shall be the only legally recognized marital contract in this state. Any policy or law or judicial interpretation, purporting to define marriage as anything other than the historical institution and legal contract between one man and one woman, is contrary to the public policy of this state and shall be void and unenforceable in Tennessee . If another state or foreign jurisdiction issues a license for persons to marry and if such marriage is prohibited in this state by the provisions of this section, then the marriage shall be void and unenforceable in this state.

Tennessee’s marriage amendment carries some of the most powerful language protecting marriage of all the 30 states that have passed amendments (by an average vote of about 68%, BTW). More powerful than that being considered in Indiana.

So why now would Cummins, which boasts of its “top rating” by the radical Human Rights Campaign, publicly gnash its teeth over a proposed marriage amendment in one state after just months ago heralding their expansion into a state that already had a powerful amendment in place?

Maybe because in reality Cummins knows it’s not bad for business to set up shop in states that still understand the value of marriage…but it DOES have its HRC overlords to publicly appease.

Buried at the bottom of an otherwise predictable “angry conservatives” piece (that actually opens with the words “Angry conservatives…”) written following the announcement from Attorney General Eric Holder that the Department of Justice would no longer defend the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, was a curious nugget from one of the leading agitators for the destruction of marriage.

AP: Gay marriage looms big in 2012

Jon Davidson, legal director of the gay-rights group Lambda Legal, questioned whether that would have much impact on the 2012 presidential race.

“People who feel strongly that same-sex couples should not be allowed to marry were not going to vote for President Obama anyway,” he said.

A bit of wishful thinking, or willful blindness, we’d have to say.

Mr. Davidson is well aware of these numbers from 2008, but allow us to remind him:

President Obama took 61% of the California vote to Sen. McCain’s 37%.

Proposition 8, California’s state constitutional marriage protection amendment, cruised to a comfortable 52.24%-47.76% win.

The math isn’t all that hard. The fact is, plenty of folks who voted for then-candidate Obama also voted to restore the definition of marriage in deep-Blue California.

A more accurate rendering of reality comes from ADF Senior Legal Counsel Austin R. Nimocks.

ADF: ADF statement in response to DOJ letter on Defense of Marriage Act

“Marriage is a unifying issue in America. The federal Defense of Marriage Act reflects the reality that 90 percent of states protect marriage and that the citizens in those states believe in marriage as a union only between one man and one woman. Tragically, the Department of Justice has chosen to appease a small–but vocal and wealthy–constituency and abandon its duty to the people.”

The truth is, no matter how many times we are lectured on the “inevitability” of counterfeit same-sex “marriage,” every time the American people have the opportunity to stand up for marriage, we do. More often than not, the results, at the only polls that really matter, are overwhelming…whether the anti-marriage forces “like it or not.”

More likely than the ho-hum response some dream of to the DOJ action, is what ADF attorney Jim Campbell says in the lead quote in the AP piece:

“The ripple effect nationwide will be to galvanize supporters of marriage,” said staff counsel Jim Campbell of the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal group.

AP: Church group blasts Obama for abandoning Defense of Marriage Act

A coalition of 34,000 black churches is blasting President Barack Obama’s decision to stop defending the federal law that bans recognition of gay marriage.

The Rev. Anthony Evans, who heads the National Black Church Initiative, says Obama “has violated the Christian faith” by failing to uphold Jesus’ teaching that marriage is between a man and a woman.

Catholic voters tilted 54%-45% for President Obama in 2008, but the US Bishops issued the following statement: USCCB Decries Refusal to Support Defense of Marriage Act

Hard to imagine that Mr. Davidson is right and Mr. Campbell is wrong about this one.

Search the Blog

Stay Connected to Speak Up.

View Posts by Author

Authors

ADF

© 2014 Alliance Defending Freedom. All Rights Reserved.